SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH - PRINCIPAL BENCH CHHATTISGARH
MAHESH KUNJAM & ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAJKUMAR PALI', '', 'Amit Kumar Sahu', 'A G']

Page No.1

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

MCRCA No. 862 of 2019

1. Mahesh Kunjam, S/o Bharat Kunjam Aged About 30 Years Caste

Gond, R/o Hathkongera, Tahsil Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker,

Chhattigarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh

2. Mahendra Kunjram Ramkaran Kunjam Aged About 32 Years Cast

Gond R/o Hathkongera, Tahsil Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker,

Chhattisgarh.

3. Birbal Bhaskar S/o Chamru Ram Aged About 35 Years Caste Gond,

R/o Village-Talakurra, Police-Station-Korar, District : Kanker,

Chhattisgarh

4. Nirmal Bhaskar S/o Chamru Ram Aged About 40 Years R/o Village

Talakurra, Police Station Korar, District Kanker Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicants

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station

Korar, District Kanker Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent

__________________________________________________________

For Applicants

:

Mr. Amit Kumar Sahu, Advocate.

For Respondent

:

Mrs. Madhunisha Singhi, PL.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice

Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

Order On Board

21/06/2019

1. The applicants have preferre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top