SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH - PRINCIPAL BENCH CHHATTISGARH
HIMANSHU PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates:
['Aman Sharma', '', 'M D SHARMA', 'C D SHARMA', 'PRITAM TIWARI', 'A G']

Order on Board

13.07.2022 Since these two appeals are arising out of the same crime number both are disposed of by this common orders.

2. These appeals under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, (hereinafter referred to as “Special Act”) have been filed against the order dated 12.05.2022 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Korba District Korba, rejecting the application u/s 439 Cr.PC in connection with the Crime No. 54/2022 registered at Police Station Pasaan, District Korba, CG, for the offence punishable under Sections 294, 186, 332 of the IPC and Sections 3 (1)

(), ( ) & 3 (2) (v-) of SC/ST ( Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

3. Case of the prosecution in short is that the present appellants and other accused had hurled filthy abuses at the police personals in the name of their caste and also beaten them.

4. Counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants are innocent and have been implicated in a false case. He submits that infact one person namely Deepak Tekam was taken into custody by the police of police station Pasaan, and the appellants in order to ascertain why he was taken into custody, they went to the police stat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top