SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SURESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC 3203/2021



1

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WPC No. 3203 of 2021

Suresh Kumar S/o Late Dakor Singh Aged About 60 Years R/o Village- Jhirouni,

Tahsil-Kawardha, District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha

(Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster

Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District-

Raipur, Chhattisgarh,

2. Collector, Kabirdham, District-Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh,

3. Sub Divisional Officer (R)/bodla, District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh,

4. Nayab Tahsildar Kawardha District-Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh,

5. Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Division Kabirdham, District-

Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh,

---- Respondents

For Petitioner

:

Mr. F.S. Khare, Advocate

For State

:

Mr. Gagan Tiwari, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice

Goutam Bhaduri

Order on Board

09.08.2021

Heard

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that part of the lands of the petitioner

were acquired for construction of the road and compensation was not paid, as such

in order to ascertain the extent of land which is used, the application was filed

before the Tehsildar by Annexure P/2 on 04.03.2021 with a payment of Challan.

However, the Tehsildar refused to accept the same. Therefore, the prayer made by

the petitioner is that the Respondent No. 4 Nayab Tehsildar may be directed to

demarcate the land of the petitioner to ascertain whether the land has been used

for construction of road or not.

2. Considering the prayer made, if the road has been constructed over the land of the

petitioner then it can only be ascertained by demarcation of the land and even

2

otherwise the respondent No. 4 Nayab Tehsildar is under statutory duty to

demarcate the land under the Land Revenue Code 1959 if the application is filed.

Annexure P/2 and the Challan would show that the application was filed for

demarcation of the land on 04.03.2021.

3. Considering the same, the Respondent No. 4 Nayab Tehsildar Kawardha Distt.

Kabirdham is directed to demarcate the land of the petitioner by acceptance of the

application of demarcation. The petitioner is directed to file his application with the

copy of the order before the Nayab Tehsildar in person if the earlier application is

not traced. Thereafter the Respondent No. 4 Nayab Tehsildar shall demarcate the

land of the petitioner within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of

application for demarcation afresh. Subsequent thereto, if it is found that the land of

the petitioner is enveloped within construction of the road then in such case the

proceeding for payment of compensation be drawn in accordance with law as early

as possible.

4. With the aforesaid observation/ direction, the petition stands disposed off.

Sd/-

(Goutam Bhaduri)

Judge

Vishakha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top