NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WPC No. 3122 of 2021

 Taduri Prakash Chandra Sudhindra, S/o T P Chandra, Aged About 37 Years

R/o Plot - 12, Block - 12, Priyadarshani Parisar - West, Bhilai, District Durg,

Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Board of Control For Cricket In India (Through Secretary), Cricket Centre,

2nd Floor, Wankhede Stadium, D Road, Churchgate, Mumbai 400020, India.

2. The Ombudsman, Board Of Control For Cricket In India, Cricket Centre, 2nd

Floor, Wankhede Stadium, D Road, Churchgate, Mumbai 400020, India.

3. Union Of India (Through Secretary, Department Of Sports, Ministry Of

Youth Afairs And Sports), C-Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.

---- Respondents

For Petitioner

:

Shri Pankaj Singh, Advocate.

For BCCI

:

Shri Ayush Singh Solanki, Advocate

For Union of India

:

Shri Tushar Dhar Diwan, A.S.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel

Order On Board

10/08/2022

1. Heard on admission.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that a punishment of life

ban has been imposed upon the petitioner vide order dated

30.06.2012 for spot fiing/match-fiing, therefore, the petitioner

preferred a representation dated 19.09.2012 i.e. Anneiure P-3.

Lastly, he again made a representation through e-mail dated

09.06.2021 which is still pending.

3. Learned Counsel for petitioner further submits that respondent No.1

i.e. BCCI has directed to refer the representation submitted by the

petitioner to respondent No.2. He further submits that respondent

No.2 may be directed to decide the same as early as possible and this

petition may be disposed of.

4. Learned Counsel for respondent No.1 is not opposing the prayer

made by counsel for the petitioner.

5. On due consideration, this petition is disposed of with a direction

that respondent No.1 i.e. the BCCI shall forward the representation

of the petitioner to respondent No.2 within two weeks from the

receipt of this order. Thereafter, respondent No.2 is directed to

decide the representation of the petitioner as early as possible,

preferably within sii months from receipt of representation.

Petitioner is in further liberty to put other relevant facts and

materials before respondent No.2.

6. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of at motion

stage itself.

Sd/-

(Arvind Singh Chandel)

Judge

Prakash