Panda Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH - PRINCIPAL BENCH CHHATTISGARH
Panda Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Advocates:
['ARUN KUMAR KOCHAR', '', 'Dev Ashish Biswas', 'RAHIL ARUN KOCHAR', 'RENU KOCHAR', 'Aparajita Gaikwad', 'Kulesh Kumar Sahu', 'AG']

CAV JUDGMENT

Per NK Chandravanshi, J

1. Since both the above appeals arise out of same crime number and same sessions trial, they are heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.

2. Both the appeals have been preferred against judgment dated 21-12-2012 passed by the Sessions Judge, Kabirdham (Kawardha), CG in Sessions Case No. 42/2011, whereby the respondent No. 1 Uttam (of Acq. Appeal No. 76/2013) has been acquitted from the offences under Section 302 (twice) and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) (twice) and appellant Panda Sahu (of Cr. A. No. 11/2013) has been convicted and sentenced as under :-

Sr. No.	Conviction for Offence u/S.	Sentence	Fine sentence	Default clause
1	302/34 of IPC (twice)	Imprisonment for life (twice)	Rs. 2,000/- (twice)	RI for six months (twice)
2.	201/34 of IPC (twice)	RI for 7 years (twice)	Rs. 1,000/- (twice)	RI for six months

All the substantive jail sentences have been directed to run concurrently.

3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that on 7-1-2011, Bharat Janghel (deceased) and Meghnath Yadav (deceased)

had gone from their village Belgaon to village Kurva on motorcy

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH - PRINCIPAL BENCH CHHATTISGARHPanda Sahu – AppellantVersusState Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH - PRINCIPAL BENCH CHHATTISGARH
Panda Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent