SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Mohd. Maksud and ANR – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
MCRC 4011/2016



Advocates:
['JAMEEL AKHTAR LOHANI', '', 'SURYAKANT MISHRA', 'A G']

1

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

MCRC No. 4011 of 2016

1. Mohd. Maksud, Aged About 25 Years, S/o Shri Ishaq @ Dallu, By

Caste Muslim, R/o Village Nayapara, Ward No. 05, Mahasamund,

Tahsil - Police Station - And Civil & Rev. Distt. & District

Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

2. Mohd. Ishaq @ Dallu, Aged About 55 Years, S/o Shri Niyaj, By

Caste Muslim, R/o Village Nayapara, Ward No. 05, Mahasamund,

Tahsil, Police Station - And Civil And Rev. Distt. & Distt.

Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicants

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Mahasamund, Civil & Rev.

District And Distt. Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent

For applicants - Shri J.A. Lohani, Advocate.

For Respondent/State – Ms. K. Tripthi Rao, PL.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

Order

29/07/2016

1.

This is second bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. The

earlier bail application was dismissed on 22/12/2015.

2.

The applicants have preferred this application for grant of bail as

they are arrested in connection with Crime No.278/2015 registered in

Police Station Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) for offence

punishable under section 307/34 of Indian Penal Code of 1860 and

Sections 25, 27 of Arms Act.

3.

As per the prosecution case, on 24/06/2015 one of the co-accused

Nasru @ Nasir had quarrel with Mohd. Faiz Quereshi. On the date when

complainant and Nasru wanted to settle the matter at that time brother of

Nasru and father present applicants Mohd. Maksud and Mohd. Ishaq

came who were holding chopper and pipe and they started beating Mohd.

Faiz and Asif at the instance of Nasir, thereby offence is committed.

2

4.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the two injured

namely Mohd. Faiz Quereshi and Mohd. Asif Quereshi has been

examined and they have attributed main assault was made by Nasru,

therefore the applicants may be released on bail.

5.

Learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail.

6.

Perused the statement of Mohd. Faiz Quereshi and Mohd. Asif

Quereshi wherein allegation of assault is on Nasru and Mohd. Maksud

applicant No.1 herein. Considering the statement and role played by

applicant No.2 Mohd. Ishaq and taking into his age he is aged about 55

years, this court is inclined to release the applicant No.2 Mohd. Ishaq on

bail. As the allegation of assault is also on applicant No.1 Mohd. Maksud,

this court is not inclined to release the applicant No.1 Mohd. Maksud on

bail.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application in respect of applicant No.1

Mohd. Maksud is dismissed and bail application in respect of applicant

No.2 Mohd. Ishaq is allowed and it is directed that the applicant No.2

Mohd. Ishaq shall be released on his furnishing personal bond for a sum

of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of

concerned trial court for his regular appearance before it as and when

directed.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/-

(Goutam Bhaduri)

JUDGE

gouri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top