SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
RAJNIKANT – Appellant
Versus
MANOJ KUMAR – Respondent


Order On Board

23/08/2021

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been brought being aggrieved by the order dated 2.8.2021 passed in the execution of award dated 22.10.2002 in Claim Case No.86/2002.

2. The execution case mentioned hereinabove is pending since more than 10 years. The learned MACT has mentioned in the impugned order that earlier the proceeding was initiated for sending the petitioner to civil jail and after his arrest, he was granted bail on terms and conditions as imposed. It is ordered that the petitioner has not complied with the conditions of grant of bail, therefore, order has been passed for issuing notice to the surety to show cause why the amount of surety should not be recovered from him.

3. It is submitted by the counsel for petitioner, that the petitioner was driver of the vehicle which met with an accident and resulted in death of the deceased, whose legal representatives are respondent No.1 to respondent No.5, who were claimants in the claim case. It is submitted that in the award dated 22.10.2002, the learned AMACT has held the petitioner and the vehicle owner jointly and severally liable for the payment of compensation. It is su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top