HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
RAJNIKANT – Appellant
Versus
MANOJ KUMAR – Respondent
Order On Board
23/08/2021
1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been brought being aggrieved by the order dated 2.8.2021 passed in the execution of award dated 22.10.2002 in Claim Case No.86/2002.
2. The execution case mentioned hereinabove is pending since more than 10 years. The learned MACT has mentioned in the impugned order that earlier the proceeding was initiated for sending the petitioner to civil jail and after his arrest, he was granted bail on terms and conditions as imposed. It is ordered that the petitioner has not complied with the conditions of grant of bail, therefore, order has been passed for issuing notice to the surety to show cause why the amount of surety should not be recovered from him.
3. It is submitted by the counsel for petitioner, that the petitioner was driver of the vehicle which met with an accident and resulted in death of the deceased, whose legal representatives are respondent No.1 to respondent No.5, who were claimants in the claim case. It is submitted that in the award dated 22.10.2002, the learned AMACT has held the petitioner and the vehicle owner jointly and severally liable for the payment of compensation. It is su
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.