HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Tihar Say @ Guddu(In Jail) – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
CRA 1556/2015
['SAMIR SINGH', '', 'ANIL GULATI', 'A G']
Cr.A.No.1556/2015
Page 1 of 24
AFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Criminal Appeal No.1556 of 2015
{Arising out of judgment dated 29-9-2015 in Sessions Trial
No.338/2013 of the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Ambikapur}
Judgment reserved on: 12-10-2022
Judgment delivered on: 2-11-2022
Tihar Say @ Guddu, S/o Kalapnath, aged about 35 years, R/o Village
Hansdand, Thana Lakhanpur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.)
(In Jail)
---- Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station Lakhanpur, Distt. Sarguja
(C.G.)
---- Respondent
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Appellant:
Mr. Samir Singh, Advocate.
For Respondent/State: Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Deputy Advocate General
and Mr. Sudeep Verma, Deputy Govt. Advocate.
Amicus Curiae:
Ms. Aditi Singhvi, Advocate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and
Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, JJ.
C.A.V. Judgment
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the CrPC preferred
by the appellant is directed against the impugned judgment dated
29-9-2015, by which the appellant has been convicted under
Sections 302 & 307 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo
Cr.A.No.1556/2015
Page 2 of 24
imprisonment for life & pay a fine of
500/-, in default of
₹
payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for one
year and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years & pay a
fine of 500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo
₹
simple imprisonment for one month, respectively.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 22-8-2013, at about
10-11 p.m., at Village Hansdand, Khutenpara, under Police
Station Lakhanpur, District Surguja, the appellant entered into the
house of Budhram (since deceased) and firstly assaulted Jhunni Bai,
wife of Budhram, by iron axe by which she suffered injuries which
were sufficient to cause death and thereafter, caused the murder of
Budhram and thereby committed the offence. Further case of the
prosecution, in brief, is that on the fateful day, the deceased and
his wife were lying in front of their house as their two sons had not
returned home from work and therefore they did not close their
doors and were waiting for them to come and meanwhile, at 10 O’
clock in the night, the appellant came by pushing the door and
asked for liquor / tobacco from Jhunni Bai (PW-2) to which she
said that she did not have the same then the appellant chased her
and assaulted her in the courtyard by which she became
unconscious and thereafter, the appellant came back and assaulted
her husband Budhram on his head, neck and back portion of the
body by which he suffered injuries and he was hospitalized where
Cr.A.No.1556/2015
Page 3 of 24
he died on 30-8-2013. It is also the case of the prosecution that
on hearing the cries of Budhram and his wife Jhunni Bai, Patango
(PW-3) reached to the spot, as she is the neighbour, and on
bearing asked, Budhram informed her that Tihar Sai has assaulted
him and his wife, which she informed to Uddesh Ram (PW-1) and
then Uddesh Ram (PW-1) reached to the spot and thereafter, on
the report of Uddesh Ram (PW-1), morgue was registered vide
Ex.P-6 on 30-8-2013. Injured Jhunni Bai (PW-2) was sent to
Community Health Centre, Lakhanpur where she was medically
examined vide Ex.P-12, which has been proved by Dr. Om Prakash
Prasad (PW-5). Naksha Panchayatnama was prepared vide Ex.P-
16. Dead body of deceased Budhram was sent for postmortem
examination and postmortem was conducted by Dr. Binod Kumar.
On the memorandum statement of the appellant vide Ex.P-8,
bloodstained iron axe was seized vide Ex.P-10 and other articles
were also seized. Statements of the witnesses were recorded under
Section 161 of the CrPC..
3. Upon due investigation, charge-sheet was filed agai