SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH - PRINCIPAL BENCH CHHATTISGARH
LAKESH @ LOKESH DHRUV – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates:
['RISHIKANT MAHOBIA', '', 'A K PRASAD', 'AMAN KESHARWANI', 'A G']

CAV Judgment

1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated

21.11.2016 passed in Sessions Trial No.25/2016 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.), whereby the Appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 294, 323, 506B, 354A, 354B, 384, 385 & 395 of the Indian Penal Code (for short “IPC”) and Section 67 of IT Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 1 month and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-, R.I. for 3 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, R.I. for 1 year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, R.I. for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, R.I. for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, R.I. for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, R.I. for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, R.I. for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, R.I. for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and R.I. for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 20,000/- respectively, with default stipulations. All jail sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. According to case of the prosecution, on 04.05.2015 while the complainant- Ku. Niti Dhrue and one Bhopal Sahu were going to their sister's house for attending marriage c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top