SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH - PRINCIPAL BENCH CHHATTISGARH
MUKHI RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates:
['PUNIT RUPAREL', '', 'KALPESH RUPAREL', 'A G']

Order on Board

17-12-2021 Heard.

1. This petition has been brought praying for review of the order dated

24.07.2017 passed in W.P. No.806 of 2005 by the Single Bench. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in W.P. No.806 of 2005, the petitioner had raised the issue that the petitioner, who was appointed as and working as Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Batara was removed vide order dated 15.09.2003 passed by Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Pali (respondent No.5), which was in clear violation of Rule 7 of Chhattisgarh Panchayat Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 (in short 'the Rules, 1999). This Court has in the case of Dhaluram Kosaria Vs. State of C.G. & Others reported in 2006 (2) C.G.L.J. 186 clearly held that in such a case, the applicability of Rule 7 of the Rules, 1999 is explicit. It is then similarly held in the case of Kailash Kumar Parmanand Dangi vs State Of M.P. And Others reported in 1999 (2) MPLJ 722. It is submitted that the learned Single Bench has without considering on this legal provision, passed the impugned order.

2. It is submitted that the petitioner had preferred Writ Appeal No.391 of

2017, which has been disposed off vide

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top