SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri,Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
VINOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SMT. SONIYA YADAV – Respondent


NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR FA(MAT) No. 43 of 2021 • Vinod Kumar S/o Munna Ram Aged About 26 Years Caste Bargah, Resident Of Village Baraudhi, Police Station Bhatgawan, Tahsil Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellant Versus • Smt. Soniya Yadav W/o Vinod Kumar Yadav Aged About 34 Years Caste -

Bargah, Resident Of Village Baraudhi, At Present Resident Of Village Bhitthikala, P.S. Gandhinagar, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Appellant : Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate For Respondent : Shri Dev Ashish Biswas, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Judgment on Board Per Goutam Bhaduri, J.

04/01/20 22 Heard.

1. The present appeal is against the judgment and decree dated

11.08.2021 passed by the Family Court, Ambikapur whereby the application under Section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was allowed and the stridhan was directed to be returned to the wife/

plaintiff.

2. The brief facts of the case is that Smt. Soniya Yadav was married to Shri Vinod Kumar on 20.05.2013 at village Bhitthikala, District Ambikapur. Subsequently, their marriage entered into rough weather and eventually a decree of div

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top