HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
NIKHIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC 7273/2021
['SANJAY AGRAWAL', '', 'MOHIT KUMAR', 'MONIKA SINGH', 'SHRUTI SHRIVASTAVA', 'A G']
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 7273 of 2021
• Nikhil Kumar, S/o Siddeshwar Prasad Singh, aged about 34
Years, R/o B-16 Anand Nagar, Telibandha District - Raipur
(Chhattisgarh).
---Applicant
Versus
• State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Police Station - Mana Camp,
Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh).
----Non-applicant
For Applicant
Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate.
For State
Shri Rahim Ubwani, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya
Order on Board
27/09/2021
1. The applicant has preferred this first bail application under
Section 439 of Cr.P.C. as he has been arrested in connection
with Crime No.134/2021 registered at Police Station Mana Camp,
District Raipur, C.G. for the offence punishable under Sections
39(2), 49-B, 51, 52 & 9 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and
Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.
2. As per the prosecution case, on 28.07.2021 secret information
was received by the police of Mana Camp, Raipur that the
present Applicant along with co-accused- Manish Agrawal are
carrying skin of leopard on Activa bearing No. CG04 MF 6081.
On receiving said information, police personnel proceeded to the
spot, caught the accused persons and recovered a bag
2
containing one packet of skin of leopard from them.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is an
innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. He
submits that there is no direct proof of applicant's involvement in
the alleged crime. Applicant is in jail since 28.07.2021, charge
sheet has already been filed, due to COVID 19-pandemic
conclusion of trial is likely to take some time and that co-accused
person namely- Manish Agrawal in this case has already been
granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 15.09.2021 in
MCRC No.6002 of 2021 and, therefore, the applicant be released
on bail on the ground of parity.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail
application. However, he submits that applicant has no criminal
antecedents.
5.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature
of allegation made against the applicant, the detention period of
the applicant, who is 34 years old, charge sheet has already
been filed, the fact that the co-accused person namely Manish
Agrawal in this case has already been granted regular bail by this
Court, the applicant has no criminal antecedents and there is no
likelihood of the applicant tampering with the evidence or
absconding as admitted by both the counsel and due to COVID-
19 conclusion of trial may take some time, without expressing
3
any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion
that present is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant.
Accordingly, the application is allowed. It is directed that in the
event of applicant executing a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, he shall be released on
bail on the following conditions:-
(i)
he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,
threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts
of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
fact to the Court,
(ii) he shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to
fair and expeditious trial, and
(iii) he shall appear before the trial Court on each and every
date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial.
(iv) he shall strictly follow the COVID-19 protocol issued by
the Central Government / State Government / Local
Authority.
(v)
he shall not involve himself in any offence of similar nature
in future.
Let a copy of this order be forwarded to the
concerned police station forthwith who shall inform the trial
Court in the event of appli