HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Anoop Waswani – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPCR 295/2015
['RAVINDRA AGRAWAL', '', 'akash gupta', 'VIVEK SHRIVASTAVA', 'VINAY KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA', 'H S AHLUWALIA', 'Vinod kumar palia', 'RATNESH KUMAR AGRAWAL', 'A G', '', 'ALOK BAKSHI', 'ANIMESH VERMA', 'AMIT VERMA', 'AFROJ KHAN', 'ANURAG VERMA', 'SOUMYA RAI', 'VINOD DESHMUKH', 'SANJAY KUMAR NAMDEV', 'SHASHANK THAKUR', 'ABHISHEK THAKUR', 'DASHRATH PRAJAPATI', 'SANJAY PATELSWATI VERMAIshwari Ghritlahare']
Page 1 of 5
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPCR No. 295 of 2015
Anoop Waswani, S/o Late Amar Waswani, Aged About 35 Years, R/o
Inside Bhakta Kanwar Ram Gate, Sindhi Colony, Jarhabhata, Bilaspur,
Civil & Revenue District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
1.
State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of
Home, Mantralaya Bhawan, New Raipur (C.G.)
2.
Superintendent of Police, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
3.
The Station House Officer, Police Station- Civil Lines, Bilaspur
(C.G.)
4.
Shri Q.A. Khan, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bilaspur (C.G.)
5.
Shri Narendra Banjara, Additional Tahsildar, Bilaspur (C.G.)
6.
Smt. Sandhya Namdev, Patwari, Patwari Halka No. 21, R.I.
Circle Bilaspur, Tahsil- Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
7.
Ratnesh Jaiswal, S/o Late Ramesh Kumar Jaiswal, Aged About
45 Years, R/o A-32, Vasundhra Nagar, Ring Road No. 2,
Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
---- Respondents
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Ratnesh Agrawal, Advocate.
For State/res. No. 1 to 3 :
Mr. Kapil Maini, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order On Board
08.09.2021
1.
The petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India for following relief:-
10.1
The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue
appropriate writ/writs, direction/directions, order/
orders and to direct the Respondent No. 3 to register
the F.I.R. against the Respondent No. 4 to 7 for their
illegal act of criminal conspiracy, Public servant
disobeying the law with intent to caused injury to the
person, mischief, lurking house tresspass after
prepration for hurt, assault and wrongful restraint,
dishonestly breaking open the receptacle containing
property and also for forgery and cheating and to
investigate into the matter.
10.2
That, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct an
enquiry to fix the liability of the erring officers
responsible for the illegal and inhumen act of
Page 2 of 5
demolishing the shop of the petitioner and depriving
him from his livelihood.
10.3
That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant suitable
compensation to the petitioner which this Hon'ble
Court deems fit and proper under the facts and
circumstances of the case.
10.4
The Hon'ble Court further kindly be pleased to call for
the entire records of the case of the petitioner for kind
perusal.
10.5
Any other relief, which the Hon'ble Court deems
looking to the facts and circumstances of the case,
may also be granted to the petitioner.”
2.
The brief facts as projected by the petitioner are that in the year
1967-68, brother of the petitioner- Nandlal had taken an open plot
admeasuring 345 sq.ft. on rent from owner-Madan Mohan Mitra
situated at Khasra No. 316/34, Mohalla Kududand, Tahsil & District-
Bilaspur. With permission of the owner, the petitioner has
constructed a shop there on his own expenses and started hotel
business. On 21.02.1973, a suit for eviction and arrears of rent was
filed by owner- Madan Mohan Mitra against brother of the
petitioner- Nandlal, which was partly decreed in favour of the
plaintiff- Madan Mohan Mitra and only arrears of rent part has been
decreed in favour of the landlord and rest of the claim i.e. eviction
part has been dismissed by the learned First Civil Judge Class-II,
Bilaspur in Civil Suit No. 12-A/1972. The owner of the land
preferred an appeal which was dismissed by the trial Court which
clearly establishes that the petitioner was remained in possession
of the rented plot.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in the year
1989-90, family dispute between family members of the petitioner,
which came into litigation and ultimately the litigation was ended by
compromise between the parties. In the year 1992, Civil Suit No.
39-A/1992 was filed by one Prem Chandra who was occupant of
shop of Bus Stand Bilaspur against the petitioner for permanent
injunc