SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates:
['KAMLESH KUMAR PANDEY', 'A G', '', 'G P MATHUR']

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

Cr.M.P. No.305 of 2017

1. Ramesh Kumar, son of Har Prasad, aged about 40 years,

2. Har Prasad, son of late Balaram, aged about 65 years,

3. Heera Bai, wife of Har Prasad, aged about 60 years,

4. Sunita Bai, wife of Rajesh Kumar, aged about 35 years,

All are of Caste Sahu, Resident – Akhrabhatha, Ward No.10, Sakti,

District Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh)

---- Petitioners

versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Station House Officer, Police

Station Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh)

2. Smt. Pramila Sahu, wife of Ramesh Kumar, aged about 32 years,

resident of Akhrabhatha, Ward No.10, Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa

(Chhattisgarh) (Complainant)

--- Respondents

For Petitioners

:

Shri K.K. Pandey, Advocate

For State/Respondent No.1

:

Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer

For Respondent No.2

:

Shri G.P. Mathur, Advocate

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Kumar Shukla

ORDER

17.3.2017

1.

The Petitioners have filed the instant petition under Section 482 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashment of the criminal

proceedings pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class,

Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa registered as Crimina

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top