HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
PRATAP SATNAMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC 7451/2021
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C. No. 7451 of 2021
1. Pratap Satnami, S/o Bhagirathi Satnami, aged about 32 years, R/o
Village Paibhatha, Police Station Sihava, District – Dhamtari (C.G.)
2. Raisingh Lahre, S/o Barsan Lahre, aged about 52 years, R/o Village
Jamli, Police Station Magarlod, District – Dhamtari (C.G.)
3. Onkar Kurre, S/o Ramswaroop Kurre, aged about 32 years, R/o Village
Piekbhatha, Police Station Sihava, District Dhamtari (C.G.)
---- Applicants/Accused
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer, Police of Police
Station Arjuni, District – Dhamtari (C.G.)
----Non-applicant
For Applicants : Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate.
For Non-applicant : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, PL
Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Chandravanshi
Order On Board
16.11.2021
(1)
The applicants/accused have preferred this bail application under Section 439
of the Code of Criminal Procedure for releasing them on regular bail in connection
with Crime No. 230/2021 registered at police Station Arjuni, District Dhamtari for
commission of offence punishable under Sections 4, 6 & 10 of Chhattisgarh Krishak
Pashu Parirakshan Adhiniyam, 2004 and Sections 48 & 52 of Chhattisgarh Pashu
Parihavan Niyam, 1978.
(2)
Case of the prosecution is that on 26.8.2021, upon receiving secret
information from the local member of the village to the effect the present applicants
were transporting 40 cows brutally and mercilessly for the purpose of slaughtering in
a Truck bearing registration No. C.G. 15/D.R./5632, the police of police Station
Arjuni chased & stopped the said truck, then driver, Omkar Satnami & Rai Singh fled
2
away from the spot and thereby committed the aforesaid offences. Based on the
above facts, FIR under Sections under Sections 4, 6 & 10 of Chhattisgarh Krishak
Pashu Parirakshan Adhiniyam, 2004 and Sections 48 & 52 of Chhattisgarh Pashu
Parihavan Niyam, 1978 has been registered against the applicants at Police Station
Arjuni, District Dhamtari.
(3)
Learned counsel appearing for the applicants would submit that applicants
are the innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in the crime in
question as they have not committed the alleged crime. He would further submit
that applicant No. 1 is languishing in jail since 01.09.2021 whereas applicants No. 2
& 3 are languishing in jail since 07.09.2021; charge-sheet has already been filed and
as the applicants are permanent resident of District Dhamtari, therefore, there is no
chance to influence the prosecution witnesses or absconding of the applicants,
hence, they may be released on bail.
(4)
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.
(5)
Considering the facts & circumstances of the case, nature & gravity of the
offence; also taking into consideration the fact that applicants are in detention since
01.09.2021 & 07.09.2021; charge-sheet has already been filed and the offences
registered against the applicants are triable by Judicial Magistrate, First Class ; I am
of the view that it is a fit case to release the applicants on bail. Accordingly, the bail
application is allowed.
(6)
Accused/applicants are directed to be released on bail on each of them
executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum
to the satisfaction of the trial Court. They are directed to appear before the trial Court
on each and every date given to them by the said Court till disposal of the trial.
Sd/-
(N.K. Chandravanshi)
Judge
D/-
3
4