HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Udam Singh(Out Jail) – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
CRA 381/2014
['SYED IMTIAZ ALI', '', 'SURESH TANDAN', 'A G']
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRA No.380 of 2014
• Monu @ Ajay Khatik S/o Kailash Khatik, Aged about 26 years, R/o
Lohangi Mohalla, Near Pani Tankie, District-Vidisha (M.P.), Civil &
Revenue-District-Vidisha-(M.P.)
---- Appellant
Versus
• The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through-P.S. Pailikhand (Jugad),
Distt.Gariyaband-(C.G
---- Respondent
and
CRA No. 381 Of 2014
• Udam Singh S/o Navneet Ram Ahirwar, Aged about 46 years, R/o
Khari phatak, Near Sindhi Aata Chakki, Vidisha (M.P.), Civil &
Revenue-District-Vidisha-(M.P.)
–---Appellant
Vs
• The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through-P.S. Palikhand (Jugad),
Distt.Gariyaband-(C.G.)
---- Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Appellants:Shri Suresh Tandon, Advocate in both the appeals.
For the State/Respondent :Shri Neeraj Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
Judgment on Board
07/11/2016
1. Both appeals are preferred from a common judgment passed in
Special Criminal Case No.33/2012 by Special Judge, NDPC Act,1985
Raipur on 04.09.2013 in which both the appellants have been
convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act, 1985 (for short 'the
Act') and sentenced to undergo RI for 5 years, along with fine of
Rs.5,000/-.
2
2. ASI, Love Kanwar (PW-7) posted in PS-Payalikhand (Judad), received
information on 07.09.2012 from an informer, that two persons by
name-Udham Singh and Monu @ Ajay Khatik resident of Vidisha, are
carrying Ganja and travelling in a bus no.C.G. 04/E-2544. After
recording Panchanama and sending information to SDO Police,
Mainpur, Love Kanwar(PW-7) proceeded towards the main road of
Village-Jugad, on arrival of bus No.C.G. 04/E-2544 at about 7 a.m. in
the morning it was stopped, in which appellants of both the cases
were found travelling and having in their possession three bags.
Appellants along with their bags were apprehended and a notice
under Section 50 of NDPS Act (ExP/2) was given to them. Appellants
consented to be searched by the Police Officer present vide ExP/3.
The members of raid party and the witnesses were searched vide
EX-4 and Ex.P/5, in which no objectionable substance was found in
possession of them. Vide Ex-P/6 and Ex.P/7 bags in possession of
appellants in both the cases were searched, in which the packets of
narcotic substance looking like Ganja was recovered. A recovery
memo ExP/8 was recorded separately in presence of appellants and
witnesses, the contents of packets were identified vide Ex.P/9 to be
narcotic substance Ganja. The contents of packets were taken out
and mixed vide memo ExP/10 and Ex.P/11. A weighment punchmama
was carried out of the articles recovered from both the appellants
separately vide Ex.P/13 and Ex.P/14. 19.200kg Ganja was found in
possession of appellant Udham Singh and 17.200kg Ganja was found
in possession of appellant Monu @ Ajay Khatik. Appellant in both the
cases were searched further vide memo No.Ex-P15. Narcotics
substance recovered from each appellant, was packed and sealed
vide Ex.P-16. Articles was seized vide seizure memo ExP-17 from the
appellant Udham Singh and articles were seized vide seizure memo
Ex.P-18 from appellant Monu @ Ajay Khatik. Other articles found in
search were seized from the appellant Udham Singh vide ExP-19.
Other articles found in search of appellant Monu @ Ajay Khatik were
seized vide Ex-P/20. Spot map was prepared by Investigating Officer
3
and on request of the investigating Officer, it was prepared vide Ex.P-
24 by Revenue Officer. Seized articles were sent for FSL examination.
Vide FSL report Ex.P/25 it was confirmed that the articles seized from
both the appellants was narcotic substance Ganja. Dehati Nalishi
(Ex.P-35) was recorded on the spot an