HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
MOHD. SAYYED SAROJ ALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC/7676/2021
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 7676 of 2021
Mohd. Sayyed Saroj Ali S/o Mohd. Mushkil Ali Aged About 30 Years R/o
Chhoti Bazar, Chirmiri, Police Station Chirmiri, District Koriya
Chhatisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Of
Police Station Janakpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya
(Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
For Applicant :
Shri Anil Gulati, Advocate
For Non-applicant :
Shri B.L. Sahu, Panel Lawyer
S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order On Board
03/01/2022
1. Applicant has filed this application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for
grant of regular bail as he has been arrested in connection with
Crime No.104/2021 registered at Police Station- Janakpur, District-
Koriya (C.G) for the offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC.
2. Case of prosecution is that applicant married with deceased
Jharoka Vaishnav (brahmin by caste) on 4.11.2011. On 23.6.2021,
applicant called his wife (deceased) on her mobile phone but she
did not pick up the call and thereafter he asked one Ravindra
Mandal, resident of same village Janakpur to go to resident of his
wife and ask her wife to pick up the call. When Ravindra reached
-2-
to house of applicant and peeped from window, he saw the house
articles were lying in un-arranged manner and the wife of applicant
was hanging by fan of her room. Applicant thereafter reached to
place of residence of deceased wife and lodged morgue to the
concerned police station, based upon which, aforementioned crime
was registered. During course of morgue inquiry, statements under
Section 161 of Cr.P.C. of father, mother and sister of deceased
were recorded. FIR was registered and applicant was arrested in
the aforementioned crime on 3.8.2021.
3. Learned counsel for applicant would submit that applicant has not
committed any offence as alleged against him. Applicant has not
abetted or harassed the deceased who was his wife. She was
Govt. servant and working as Teacher. Place of posting of
deceased is at different village i.e. Janakpur and applicant is
resident of Chhota Bazar, Chirmiri which is little far from place of
posting of deceased. The allegation levelled against applicant in
the statements recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. is only that
applicant was forcing the deceased to wear burka, eat non-veg and
also to change her religion. Hence, the offence as alleged against
applicant would not be attracted.
4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the submission of learned
counsel for the applicant and would submit that in the statements
recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C., parents and sister of
deceased, it has come that applicant was continuously
pressurizing the deceased to convert her religion as also to eat
non-veg and to wear burka, hence, there is specific allegation of
-3-
harassment, ill-treatment against applicant.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case,
that the applicant performed court marriage with the deceased on
4.11.2011, the nature of allegation, the period of pre-trial detention,
without commenting anything on merits, I am inclined to allow the
bail application.
7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. It is directed that
applicant shall be released on regular bail upon his furnishing a
bail bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum
to the satisfaction of the Court on the conditions that:-
a) Applicant shall appear before the trial Court regularly on
each and every date, unless exempted from appearance.
b) Applicant shall not, in any manner, tamper with the
prosecution witnesses.
c) If the applicant is found involved in similar offence in the
future, it will be open for the