SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DEVENDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SHARVAN KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAJKUMAR PALI', '', 'Amit Kumar Sahu', 'POOJA RANI PALI', 'A G', '', 'SUNIL SAHU', 'SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA']

Page 1 of 5

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WP (227) No. 478 of 2020

1.

Devendra Kumar, S/o Late Mahanguram, Aged About 50 Years.

2.

Khagesh, S/o Mahanguram, Aged About 40 Years.

3.

Smt. Sulochana, W/o Devendra Kumar, Aged About 45 Years.

Petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 are Caste Kalar, R/o Tadoki, Tehsil

Antagarh, District- Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.)

4.

Sonsay, S/o Late Sanhaguram, Aged About 55 Years.

5.

Sonu, S/o Late Sanhaguram, Aged About 48 Years, Caste Kalar

6.

Smt. Bindabai, W/o Sonsay, Aged About 50 Years, Caste Kalar

Petitioner Nos. 4 to 5 are R/o Kaleparas, Tehsil Antagarh,

District- Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.)

7.

Bharat, S/o Late Cherka, Aged About 50 Years, Caste Kalar, R/o

Village Tadoki, Tehsil Antagarh, District- Uttar Baster Kanker

(C.G.)

8.

Siyaram, S/o Late Cherka, Aged About 32 Years, Caste Kalar,

R/o Village Aidanaar, Tehsil Antagarh, District- Uttar Baster

Kanker (C.G.)

--- Petitioners

Versus

1.

Sharvan Kumar, S/o Late Chital Singh, Aged About 42 Years.

2.

Ishwar, S/o Late Chital Singh, Aged About 26 Years.

3.

Smt. Dukhibai @ Durga, W/o Late Chital Singh, Aged About 60

Years.

Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are Caste Kalar, R/o Villa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top