SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
VIJAY GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Order On Board

11/02/2021 This appeal arises out of order dated 18/06/2020 passed by the learned Special Judge (Atrocities) Balrampur-Ramanujganj by which, appellants' application for grant of anticipatory bail has been rejected mainly on the ground that bar under Section 18 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the Act of 1989') operated against the appellant.

2. The appellants are apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No.10/2020 registered at Police Station – Karoundha, District – Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) for alleged commission of offences under Section 451, 506 of IPC and Section 3 (2) (v) (a) of the Act of 1989.

3. A report / FIR was lodged by the complainant against the son of appellant No.1 – Vijay Gupta alleging commission of certain offences and therefore, the appellants forcibly entered the house of the complainant to withdraw the complaint against appellant's son – Jitendra Gupta. On the report, offence under Section 451, 506 of IPC and also Section 3 (2) (v) of the Act of 1989 was registered. The appellant's application for grant of anticipatory bail was moved stating that it is a case of false implica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top