Order on Board

07/09/2018

1. The relief sought for by the petitioner is for a direction to the respondents to quash the advertisement which has been issued by the respondents on 08.08.2018.

2. The facts of the case is that the petitioner has been appointed for the first time under the respondent No.2 on 14.08.2017. The order of appointment clearly reflects that the appointment was issued for a period of one year or till the regular appointment in the department is made. It was also clearly reflected that the appointment was contractual in nature and his service conditions would be governed by the rules framed for contractual employee. The said tenure of the petitioner came to an end on 14.08.2018. Meanwhile, the respondent No.2 have issued an advertisement dated 08.08.2018 for filling up of the post of Assistant Professor in the department of Bio Technology by way of guest faculty. It is this that the petitioner was aggrieved of.

3. The petitioner submits that since the petitioner was in contractual employment and his services were not in any manner unsatisfactory, the respondents should have, in all fairness, continued the services of the petitioner till the regular appointment is ma