SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil Kumar Sinha,
C.L. GHRITLAHARE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


CAV Order

Per Parth Prateem Sahu, J

1. Order declining interference with the posting order of petitioner/appellant by the learned Single Judge is put to challenge in this appeal.

2. Facts projected by petitioner/appellant in appeal are that appellant, who was holding the post of Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, was initially transferred from the office of Janpad Panchayat Pendra to Janpad Panchayat Kartala, District Korba on administrative ground vide order dated 13.9.2019. In pursuance of the said order, petitioner/appellant was relieved on 4.10.2019 and he joined at the transferred place on 9.10.2019. Appellant could not get charge of Chief Executive Officer at the transferred place, which made him to file writ petition before the High Court bearing WPS No.10323/2019, which came to be decided on 27.1.2020. Pursuant thereto respondents passed order, one Shri G.K. Mishra, who was working as Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kartala, has been posted in the office of Assistant Commissioner and appellant has been given charge of Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kartala. Within few months of taking charge of Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kartala, res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top