HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
AMIT RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
CRA 1480/2018
['S P SAHU', '', 'J R SAHU', 'A G']
Page 1 of 9
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Judgment Reserved on : 16.11.2021
Judgment Delivered on : 08.12.2021
CRA No.1480 of 2018
Amit Ram, S/o- Lohar Sai Painkra, Aged about- 18 years 6
months, R/o- Village Amartha, Police Station- Shankergarh,
District- Balrampur (C.G.)
---- Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Police Station Sanna, District-
Jashpur (C.G.)
---- Respondent
For Appellant
: Shri S. P. Sahu, Advocate
For Respondent/State
: Shri Chitendra Singh, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya
CAV Judgment
1.
This appeal is filed under Section 374 (2) of Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment of conviction
and order of sentence dated 28.06.2018, passed by the
Sessions Judge, Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) in Session
Case No. 17/2018, whereby the appellant Amit Ram stands
convicted and sentenced as under:-
Conviction
Sentence
Under Section 304 part-II
of Indian Penal Code
R.I. for five years with fine of Rs.
1,000/- and in default of
payment of fine amount further
R.I. for three months.
2.
As per prosecution case, PW/1 Nandkumar Painkra,
Page 2 of 9
appellant Amit Ram and deceased Dhaneshwar were
working under Parmanand Chouhan and would operate the
swing of Parmanand Chouhan. Prior to one day of incident
i.e. 25.11.2017 the swing of Parmanand Chouhan was
installed in the fair at village Champa and on the next day
i.e. 26.11.2017 when fair was over and while PW/13
Nandkumar Painkra and the appellant were unbolting the
swing, deceased Dhaneshwar started raising dispute with
them over moblie phone. In this process, the appellant
assaulted the deceased with a club on his head. However,
next morning as the deceased was not feeling well he was
taken to hospital at village Champa and from there he was
taken to Ambikapur Hospital where he died on 27.11.2017.
3.
Merg intimation was given by PW/9 Utkarsh Kumar. During
investigation, inquest over the dead body was conducted
vide Ex.P/9 and thereafter, PW/12 Dr. B.C. Painkra
cunducted post-mortem vide Ex.P/17 and notice following
injuries: (i) lacerated wound present over right temporo
parietal region of skull sized 2”x1”x1/2 cm, (ii) abrasion over
right leg, lower portion (front part) sized 1/2”x1” and (iii)
abrasion over left knee joint (front portion) sized 1”x1/2”.
4.
PW/12 Dr. B.C. Painkra opined the cause of death as coma,
mode of death as subdural haemorrhage due to injury
number 1 and the
death was homicidal in nature.
5.
Site plan Ex.P/1 and P/15 were prepared, plain and blood
stained soil were seized from the place of occurance and on
Page 3 of 9
the memorandum of appellant No. 1 bamboo club, half
jeans pant & one full shirt were seized vide Ex.P/4. Clothes
of the deceased were also seized vide Ex. P/11. As per
Progress report and Aadhar Card of the appellant were
seized vide Ex.P/12, he was found to be above 18 years of
age on the date of incident. The seized articles were sent to
FSL for chemical examination and report of FSL is Ex.P/6.
According to which, human blood was found on the club and
clothes seized from the accused as well as on the cloths of
the deceased. After recording statements of the witnesses
and completing the investigation charge-sheet was filed
against the appellant u/s 302 of IPC.
6.
The trial Court framed charge u/s 302 of IPC against the
appellant, who denied the same and prayed for trial.
7.
Prosecution in order to prove its case examined as many as
14 witnesses and statement of the appellant was also
recorded u/s 313 of CrPC where he denied the incriminating
circumstances appearing against him in the prosecution
case, pleaded innocence and prayed for trial. However, no
witness was examined or any evidence aduced by him in his
defence.
8.
The trial court, considering overall material available on
record by the im