SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Pukeshwar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Kumar Sahu – Respondent


Advocates:
['SUNIL TRIPATHI', '', 'APOORVA TRIPATHI', 'JYOTI SINGH']

1

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

CRMP No. 1064 of 2017

Pukeshwar Prasad S/o Visheshar Ram Sen Aged About 40 Years

R/o Village- Newari, Tahsil- Simga, Police Station Suhela,

District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

Krishna Kumar Sahu S/o Shankar Lal Sahu, Aged About 45

Years Occupation Jail Police, R/o Up Jail, Gariyaband, District

Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent

For the Petitioner

:

Shri Sunil Tripathi, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

Order on Board

18.08.2017

Heard on admission.

1. This petition has been brought with prayer to issue specific direction to

the Trial Court with respect to the pending proceedings based on the

complaint filed by the petitioner

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a complaint for

prosecuting the respondents under Section 138 of Negotiable

Instrument Act, 1881 was filed before the Trial Court alongwith

affidavit as per the requirements of Section 145 of Negotiable

Instrument Act. The Trial Court on receiving the complaint has not

taken cognizance and has not registered the case. On the contrary

date has been fixed for reco

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top