HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
SURUJLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC 9993/2021
['Sareena Khan', '', 'R K BANJARE', 'A G']
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Proceeding through video conferencing
MCRC No. 9993 of 2021
Surujlal S/o Duwaru Ram Netam Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Silati,
Police Station Dhanora And Tahsil Keshkal District Kondagaon
Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station
Farasgaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh.
---- Non-Applicant
For Applicant
Ms. Sareena Khan, Adv.
For the State/Non-Applicant.
Mr. Chitendra Singh, P.L.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya
Order on Board
24/01/2022
1. The applicant has preferred this first bail application under Section
439 of Cr.P.C. as he has been arrested on 29.10.2021 in connection
with Crime No.115 of 2021 registered at Police Station-Farasgaon,
District Kondagaon, C.G. for the offence punishable under Sections
09, 39B, 51 & 52, Wild Life of Protection Act & Section 03 Prevention
of Damage to Public Property Act.
2. As per the prosecution case on 29.10.2021 secret information was
received by the Police of Farasgaon District Kondagaon,C.G. that the
present applicant namely Surujlal is selling of the leopard skin. On
receiving said information, police personnel proceeded to the spot,
caught the accused person and recovered a skin of leopard from him.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is an innocent
person and has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits
that applicant has not played any role in alleged offence. Applicant is
in custody since 29.10.2021, charge sheet has already been filed and
2
due to COVID-19 pandemic, conclusion of the trial is likely to take
some time. Therefore, he may be released on bail.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail
application. However, he submits that the applicant has no criminal
antecedent.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of
allegation against the applicant, charge sheet has been filed, the
detention period of the applicant, who is 24 years old, the fact that the
applicant has no criminal antecedents and there is no likelihood of the
applicant tampering with the evidence or absconding as admitted by
both the counsel and due to COVID-19 pandemic, conclusion of trial
may take some time, without commenting anything on merits of the
case, this Court is of the opinion that present is a fit case to release
the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. It is
directed that in the event of applicant executing a personal bond for a
sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, he shall be released on bail
on the following conditions:-
(i)
he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat
or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case
so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court,
(ii)
he shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair
and expeditious trial, and
(iii)
he shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date
given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial.
(iv)
he shall not involve himself in any offence of similar nature in
future.
(v)
he shall strictly follow the COVID-19 protocol issued by the
3
Central Government / State Government / Local Authority.
Let a copy of this order be forwarded to the concerned
police station forthwith who shall inform the trial Court in the
event of applicant involving himself in similar offence in future.
Sd/-
Gautam Chourdiya
Judge
vivek