SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Pardeshi Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPC 3523/2017



1

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

Writ Petition (C) No.3523 of 2017

Pardeshi Ram Son Of Lachan Ram, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village

Jabar, Tahsil Katgohara, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of

Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New

Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Collector, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Katgohara, District Korba,

Chhattisgarh.

5. Tahsildar, Dipka, Tahsil Katgohara, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

6. Nayab Tahsildar, Dipka, Tahsil Katgohara, District Korba,

Chhattisgarh.

7. Patwari, Patwari Halka No. 32, Village Jabar, Tahsil Katgohara,

District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents

For Petitioner

: Mr. Malay Shrivatava, Advocate

For State

: Mr. R.N. Pusty, Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order On Board

03/01/2018

(1)

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that

the petitioner's name has been deleted from the revenue records by the

respondents without being order of competent authority against which

this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been

filed.

(2)

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make

2

representation before the competent authority under Section 115 of the

Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 within a period of two weeks

from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner before the

competent authority, in that event the competent authority shall

consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law after

hearing the parties expeditiously.

(3)

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally

disposed of. No order as to costs.

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal)

Judge

L/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top