HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
SADDAM HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC 9758/2022
['JAINENDRA KUMAR SHASTRI', '', 'BRAJENDRA SINGH', 'A G']
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 9758 of 2022
Saddam Hussain, son of Mo. Shakur Mohammad, aged about 30 years, R/o
village Datima, Police Chowki Karanji, Police Station Vishrampur, District
Surajpur, CG
--- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through SHO Police Station – Jainagar, District
Surajpur, CG.
--- Respondent
For Applicant
-
Shri Shyamsundar Lal Tekchandani, Advocate on
behalf of Shri J.K. Shashtri, Advocate
For State
-
Shri Kasif Shakeel, Dy. AG
Order on Board by Hon'ble Shri Justice
Sachin Singh Rajput
14
/12/2022
This first application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure has been filed by the applicant who is in custody in connection
with Crime No. 173/2022 registered at Police Station Jainagar, District Sura-
jpur, CG for the offence punishable under Section 21 (C) of the NDPS Act.
2.
Case of the prosecution in short is that on 16.6.2022 the police of
Police station Jainagar got information that two persons were waiting for the
customers of illegal drugs, and acting upon which it grabbed the applicant
and seized the drugs i.e. 36 pieces of medicine Escuf cough syrup and 11
pieces of Rax Cough Syrup (total 47 pieces) from his possession.
3.
Counsel for the applicant submits that the volume of contraband in
each bottle has not been mentioned in the seizure memo, and therefore, as
the quantity of the contraband being the commercial quantity is not
established, the bar contained in section 37 of the Act is not attracted to the
case in hand. He submits that the applicant is in jail since 16.6.2022 and the
trial may take some time for conclusion, therefore, the applicant may be
released on bail.
2
4.
State counsel, on the other hand, opposes the application for bail and
submits that the total 47 bottles of contraband containing codene – which
comes within the commercial quantity, was seized from the applicant, bar
contained under Section 37 of the NDPS Act is clearly attracted, therefore,
he is not entitled for bail.
5.
Considering the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, the
facts and circumstances of the case, the quantity of the contraband allegedly
seized, and keeping in mind the decisions of the Apex Court in the matters of
State of Kerala v. Rajesh reported in (2020) 12 SCC 122 and Narcotics
Control Bureau v. Mohit Agrawal reported in (2022) SCC OnLine SC 891 ,
this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case to release the applicant on
bail. Accordingly, the application is rejected.
Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput)
Judge
Jyotishi