SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH - PRINCIPAL BENCH CHHATTISGARH
LALARAM SINHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


C A V ORDER

1. By this petition petitioner has questioned the order of transfer dated 16.11.2022, whereby he has been transferred from P.C. No. 57 Charoda, Tahsil – Bhilai-3 to P.C. No. 19 Aundhi, Tahsil –

Patan, District – Durg.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that transfer of petitioner is in violation of transfer policy. According to transfer policy transfer of district cadre employee is to be made from 16.08.2022 till 10.09.2022. Order of transfer of petitioner is issued on 16.11.2022, therefore, order of transfer of petitioner is issued in ban period. Petitioner is posted at P.C. No.57 Charoda on administrative ground vide order dated 18.01.2022, whereas according to Clause 1.5 of transfer policy, employees, who are posted at place on or before 15.08.2021 only to be considered for their transfer. Hence, there is violation of Clause 1.5 of transfer policy also. He also contended that according to Rule 7 of Chhattisgarh Bhu-Abhilekh Niyamawali, transfer of Patwari is to be made only on proposal sent by Tahsildar through Superintendent Land Records and in case of petitioner, no proposal is forwarded by Tahsildar and therefore, there is violation of Rule -7 of Chhattisgarh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top