HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH - PRINCIPAL BENCH CHHATTISGARH
BIRENDRA KUMAR JANGHEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
C A V ORDER
1. By this petition petitioner has questioned the order of transfer dated 16.11.2022, whereby he has been transferred from P.C. No. 4 Pahanda, Tahsil – Patan to P.C. No. 63 Gatapar, Tahsil – Patan, District – Durg with additional charge of P.C. No.51 Surpa.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that transfer of petitioner is in violation of transfer policy. According to transfer policy transfer of district cadre employee is to be made from 16.08.2022 till 10.09.2022. Order of transfer of petitioner is issued on 16.11.2022, therefore, order of transfer of petitioner is issued in ban period. Petitioner is posted at P.C. No.4 Pahanda on administrative ground vide order dated 18.01.2022, whereas according to Clause 1.5 of transfer policy, employees, who are posted at place on or before 15.08.2021 only to be considered for their transfer. Hence, there is violation of Clause 1.5 of transfer policy also. He also contended that according to Rule 7 of Chhattisgarh Bhu-Abhilekh Niyamawali, transfer of Patwari is to be made on proposal sent by Tahsildar through Superintendent Land Records and in case of petitioner, no proposal is forwarded by Tahsildar and therefore, there is v
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.