HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
SMT. NALINI MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA KUMAR PATEL – Respondent
FA(MAT) 8/2020
['PUSHKAR SINHA', '', 'SHISHIR SHRIVASTAVA', 'PAWAN SHRIVASTAVA', 'C JAYANT K RAO']
1
AFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
FA(MAT) No. 8 of 2020
• Smt. Nalini Mishra W/o Surendra Patel Aged About 34 Years R/o House No. 50,
Side Of Asina Green City Apartment, Near Durga Temple, Clay Castle Colony,
Infront Of Kamal Vihar Gate, Old Dhamtari Road, Dunda, Raipur Chhattisgarh
---- Appellant
Versus
• Surendra Kumar Patel S/o Shri B. P. Patel Aged About 32 Years R/o Janpad
Panchayat Kurud, Sub Engineer, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
For Appellant
:
Shri Shishir Shrivastava, Advocate
For Respondent
:
Shri C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Radhakishan Agrawal
Judgment on Board
Per Goutam Bhaduri, J.
18/08/2022
Heard.
1. The instant appeal is against the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2019
passed in H.M.A. 677/2017 by the learned family Court, Raipur, whereby the
application filed by the husband seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty was
allowed. The present appeal is by the wife.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the husband leveled allegation that the
marriage in between the parties solemnized on 31.10.2010 and out of the said
2
wedlock a child was born. Thereafter, with the passage of time, it is alleged
that the wife used to spent money as per her own choice and the visit of the
husband to his parents was objected & eventually stopped. It is stated
whenever he wanted to visit his parents, the wife used to abuse him resulting
into stoppage of meeting of the husband with his parents. It was further alleged
that without the consent and permission of the husband she went to a place
called Belpahad for her business at Mahanadi coalfield for the business of coal
shifting and when the husband tried to intervene, he was abused and insulted.
The respondent/husband further alleged that the wife used to take away the
entire salary of the husband and used to spent in her business and if a query
was made about the expenses, it was reciprocated with the abuses. It is
alleged that the wife procured 5 vehicles on loan without the consent of the
husband and she deliberately stopped to discharge her household
responsibilities including taking care of the child. It is stated that even the
husband was stopped to attend the marriage of his real brother and the
maternal sister of the husband when wanted to visit their place to appear in an
examination from outside, the wife alleged illicit relation of the girl with the
husband. It was further alleged that the husband is having an illicit relation with
an office colleague. In a result, the husband on different occasions made a
police report explaining the facts.
3. It is further alleged that at one occasion the wife had surreptitiously stolen away
the valuable papers which were kept in the car and the report having been
made about such theft, after CCTV footage when it was discovered that the wife
had done this, she was arrested in a criminal case. Referring to a particular
3
date, it is stated by the husband that the wife used to abuse and bald
allegations were made against the husband and even at a point of time she
assaulted the younger sister of the respondent, therefore, on various grounds,
the husband sought decree of divorce.
4. The wife in turn in reply contended that she had never misbehaved with the
husband and has not committed any cruelty but it was at the behest of the
husband after an affair, they entered into a wedlock. She further stated that the
husband knowing fully well that she is a widow, the marriage was performed.
She further stated that because of the wish and will of the husband, she
underwent a surgery to conceive the child and thereafter child was born. It is
further stated that after birth of the child, the behaviour of the husband became
strange and for the some reason or the other he wanted to separate.
Therefore, on false allegations and grounds, the application for divorce was
filed.
5. Learned family Court framed