SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ALIP UDDIN SK. and ANR. – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD. and 3 ORS. – Respondent


ORDER

Date : 06-03-2020 Heard Mr. B. Chanda, learned counsel for the petitioners in both the writ petitions and Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing counsel, Assam Power Distribution Company Limited (APDCL). Also heard Ms. D.D. Barman, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for respondent no. 3, Chief Electrical Inspector, Government of Assam.

2. As the subject-matters involved in both the writ petitions are similar, both the writ petitions are taken up together for disposal on being agreed by the learned counsel for the parties. The common subject-matter in the writ petitions is death of the victims, both minors, in two separate incidents stated to have occurred due to electrocution and directions have been sought for in these two writ petitions, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to the respondent APDCL authorities to grant compensation for such deaths. The relevant facts, in brief, leading to the institution of these two writ petitions and the stands taken on behalf of the respondent authorities are stated separately as under :

W.P.(C) 5376/2017:

3. The two petitioners herein are the parents of one Sahidul Islam. It is projected that on 15.10.2016, at abo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top