SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ITANAGAR BENCH
Kirri Dini Bogum – Appellant
Versus
Jamar Karlo – Respondent


ORDER

Date : 13-06-2023 Heard Ms. D. Tamuk, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G. Bam, learned counsel for the sole respondent.

2]. By filing this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the order, dated 23.03.2022, bearing No.LKB/JK/46- 09/2018/75-II passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Lower Siang District, Likabali, whereby the claims of the petitioner has been rejected by upholding the various Keba decisions including the Banggo Level Keba decision dated

30.05.2018 and on the ground of delay of 12 years.

3]. Leaving aside the unnecessary facts, the case of the petitioner in short is that in the year 2018, the petitioner on coming to know that the sole respondent has been claiming the ownership over the plot of land which belonged to the petitioner and his family and also the Keba decision dated 19.06.2006 and various other Kebas were held in respect of the petitioner’s land in absence of the petitioner and his family members and without the knowledge of the petitioner’s late father or any of his family member, between the sole respondent and other individuals in respect of the petitioner’s plot of land inherited from his father

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top