SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ITANAGAR BENCH
Mrs. Susmita Phukan Khaund, J
Duge Taipodia and Anr. – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Commissioner and 2 Ors. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ninnong Ratan
For the Respondents: GA (AP), Kamal Saxena, Vijay Jamoh

JUDGMENT

Date : 26-09-2023

1. Heard Mr. V. Jamoh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. P. Sangita, learned Government Advocate for the respondent No. 1 & 2. Also heard Mr. R.L Thungong, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3. The respondent No. 3 is the petitioner of CRP No. 42(AP)/2022

2. The Civil Revision Petition No. 20(AP)/2021 is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (C.P.C for short), with prayer to set aside and quash the impugned Order No. LKB/JUD-K/42-09/2018/305 dated 22.09.2021 passed by the Addl. Deputy Commissioner-cum-Executive Magistrate (ADC for short), Lower Siang District, Likabali, whereby and where under, the ownership of the ancestral land of the petitioners have been illegally and arbitrarily decided in favour of Bali Taipodia Community. The petitioners in this case are Shri Duge Taipodia and Shri Karmi Taipodia and they are cousins. The Deputy Commissioner, (DC for short), Likabali, Additional Deputy Commissioner-cum-Executive Magistrate, (ADC for short), Likabali and Shri Mijar Taipodia are arrayed as respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The petitioners have contended that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top