HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
RAJESH NATVARLAL MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
SHREE TUSHAR PRAVINCHANDRA SHAH, PARTER OF PRAVINCHANDRA KESHRICHAND AND COMPANY – Respondent
SCR.A 10605/2019
R/SCR.A/10605/2019 ORDER DATED: 27/04/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 10605 of 2019
With
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2021
In R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 10605 of 2019
With
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 10656 of 2019
With
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2021
In R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 10656 of 2019
With
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 10669 of 2019
With
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1091 of 2020
With
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2021
In R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1091 of 2020
With
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1112 of 2020
With
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2021
In R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1112 of 2020
With
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1113 of 2020
With
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2021
In R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1113 of 2020
With
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1117 of 2020
With
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2021
In R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1117 of 2020
With
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1128 of 2020
With
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2021
In R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1128 of 2020
With
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1129 of 2020
With
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2021
In R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1129 of 2020
==========================================================
RAJESH NATVARLAL MEHTA
Versus
SHREE TUSHAR PRAVINCHANDRA SHAH, PARTER OF
PRAVINCHANDRA KESHRICHAND AND COMPANY
Page 1 of 10
R/SCR.A/10605/2019 ORDER DATED: 27/04/2022
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS SUNEETA R SHUKLA(5574) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR JIGAR M PATEL(3841) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MS MD MEHTA, ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Date : 27/04/2022
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned Advocate Ms. Suneeta R. Shukla on behalf of the
applicants and learned APP Ms. Mehta on behalf of the respondent-State,
learned Advocate Mr. Jigar M. Patel on behalf of the respondent-original
complainant.
2. Issue Rule in all these matters, learned APP Ms. M. D. Mehta as well
as learned Advocate Mr. Patel waive service of rule on behalf of the
respective respondents. The present applications are taken up for final
disposal with consent of the learned Advocates for the parties. A common
question arises for consideration of this Court in all these applications and
additionally parties to the dispute in all the applications are also common
hence, all the applications are taken up for hearing simultaneously,.
3. The question that arises for consideration of this Court in this group of
application, would be that whether the impugned complaint, should be
quashed by this Court, only on the ground that the petitioner i.e. an
Page 2 of 10
R/SCR.A/10605/2019 ORDER DATED: 27/04/2022
accused in the complaint, is not a signatory to the cheque in question,
though the cheque in question was drawn on a joint account maintained
by both the accused.
4. For the purpose of deciding the question as above, facts of the Special
Criminal Application No. 10605 of 2019 are being taken into
consideration. The applicant challenges Criminal Case No. 1253 of 2019
filed by the respondent no. 2 herein against the applicant and his wife.
Learned Advocate Ms. Shukla would submit that while the account in
question, from which the cheque had been issued, was a joint account
where both the accused i.e. the husband and wife are joint account
holders but ac