SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
PAGADALA ANANTHA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF A.P – Respondent


ORDER:

"-[his application is filed lbr relcasing the applicanti appellant (sole :rccused) in Crirninal Appeal No. 257 of 2Ol2 on bail, pencling clisposal of the Criminal Appeal, in terms of order, dated 02-l l-2016, in Batchu Ranga Rao v. State of A.P. [2016 (3)

AL'I (Crl.) sOs (DB)(AP)1.

At thc hcaring, thc lcarnctl Public Prosccutor (T.S,) on ir)structions, has subrnittcrl that npart fronr thc frct thxt the xpplicant's crse <[oes not Iall u ithin thc cxcoptions in Blchu Ranga Rao (Suprl) lbr rcjcction of hail, his conduct/bchaviou r'

is satisfactory.

In thc light of the aforcnrentioned lacts, thc applicant/appcllan t is rcleascd on bail in tcrms o{ orders, datcd 02-l l-2016, in Batchu Ranga Rao (supra) and subiect to the follorving conditions;

l. The applicant/a ppellant slrall crecutc a pcrsonal bond for a sunr of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupccs tcn thousand onlr') rlith trvo sureties lbr l likc sum e:rch to thc satisflction of thc lcarnctl Jutlicial N'lxgistrutc of liirst (llass, NI:rnttguru, lihatnnraln l)istlict.

during the bail period.

-1. 'l'hc applicant nrust be prcscnt bcforc thc Court at tltc tinrc o[

hcaring of tlre crinrin:tl irppcirl.

It is fulther tlirccted that Orrlcr, datcd 02.11.2(116

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top