SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KONGARA SUBRAMANYAM NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF A.P – Respondent


ORDER:

"This :rpplication is filctl lbr rcleasing thc applicnnt/appcllant (sole irccusctl) in Crl.A.No.8.l9 of 2012 on bail, pcntling disposal of thc crintinal appcal, in tcrtus of order, dated 02.11.2016, in Batchu Ranga Rao r'. Statc ol A.P. [20](r (3) ALI' (Crl.)

sos (DB)(AP)1.

..\t the hcaring, thc Iearlretl I)ublic I)rosectttor ('I'.S.), on itrstrttctions, has sultntittecl that lrplrt fronr thc fact thrt thc:rpplicant's case rloes not lilll \\ithin thc erceptions in B:rtchu R:rnga Rlo (supra) tbr re.jcctiort of bail, his cotrtluct/be ltar iour is satis fxctol')'.

I' Thc a pplican t/a [)r)cllil nt shir erecute a pcrsrnal bo,tl rirr a sunr or.

Rs.l0,()00/- (llupees te, Irlousilrr(l ,rh.) rrith t\\o s.r.etics rbr a liric sur. cach ttl thc satis'action of learncrr -\ ,\(r(ritiorrrr fihicr'\rctropolit., \tirgistr-irtc, Sec rr n rlc ra lt ir rl -

2' Thc ap,licl.t/a pJrcr,n t shl, also .rrrris' his resirrc.tial arrrlress to the Policc Statiorr corrccruetl inrrncdiirtclt, altcr his relcasc anrl r.cl)ot.t in the said Police Station oncc in I nronth rluring thc lluil pcriorl.

3. 1'he aPplica, t/appcrlant nrust rrc prescnt bcrirrc thc cour.t at trre ti.re or henring of the crintinal appeal, It

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top