SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
A.Hemalatha and 2 others – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana and 11 others – Respondent
WP 11691/2022



Advocates:
['VEERAMREDDIGARI PRABHAKAR REDDY', 'GP', 'GP', 'SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDYSC FORGHMC']

tI

II

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

SATURDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K,LAKSHMAN

Between:

'1 . A.Hemalatha, Wo. A.Pandu, Age. 50 Years. Occ. House wife,

2. Renuka, Wo.Narsimha, Age.54 Years,Occ. House wife,

3. S.Aruna, Wo. Rammohan Age.55 Years,Occ. House wife,

4. Rizwana Begum, Wo.lbrahim Ali khan, Age.45 Years,Occ. House wife,

All are same at D.No.35/16, Rajeev Gruhakalpa, Nizampet, Kukatapally,

Medchal-Malkajigiri District.

...PETITIONERS

AND

'1. The State of Telangana, rep by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Principal secretary to the Government, Revenue Deportment, Secretariat,

Hyderabad,TS.

3. The District Collector, Medchal District, TS.

4. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Tankbund,

Hyderabad.

5. The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District.

6. The Project Director, Housing, USD Greater Hyderabad Municipal

Corporation Tankbund,Hyderabad.

7. The Managing Director, Telangana State Housing Corporation Limited

Nampally, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

8. The Chief Engineer, ( H and A) Greater Hyderabad Municipal

Corporation,Tankbund, Hyderabad

9. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddi Divsion, Sangareddy dist

10. The Tahsildar, Patancheruvu Mandal, Sangareddi District.

1 1 . The Tahsildar, Ameenpur Mandal, Sangareddi District.

l2.Guguloth Ramesh, S/o.Narasimha,Age.50 Years, H.No.31B, lzzath Nagar,

Khanamet' RRDistrict

..RES,.NDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more in the nature of Writ of

Mandamus declaring the action of the official Respondents in not allotted the

WRIT PETITION NO: 11691 OF 2022

houses, ldentity Card: as well as house Patta Certificates to t'c 72 beneficiaries

list of petitioners alree iy paid 30 Percent beneficiary contribu: on emount as per

the directions of the G )vernment and the rest of 320 members are paid partly the

petitioners at Ramest waramband, Ameenpur Mandal Area, : ang;:reddi District

under JNNURAM Sr; eme, as per vide Proceedings Daled 1917i2021, Dated.

41212021 , dated.5l6t2)21 , Dated.Z\l712020, Dated.3lIl2O22 Dated.27l5l2020,

Dated. 1 8/6/201 9, I aled.29l11 12019, Dated.251412019 ,

Daled.241612019 ,

Dated.8/1112018, l- ated.2811l202O, Dated.l8/6/2018 t)att:d.18/6/-2018,

Dated.24t11t2O20, D rted 16/8i2018, Dated.18/6/2019 thro.rgh seniority list,

representations macir by the petitioners dated.5/512021 , l,*ed 181212022 as

illegal arbitrary and r rolation of arl 14,19,21 and 300-4 of the Oonstitution of

lndia and further to c rect the Official Respondents to allot t-e houses, ldentity

Cards as well as louse Patta Certificates to the Petiti)ners situated at

Rameshwaramba nda Ameenpur Mandal Area Sangaredd [)istrict and not to

allotted the houses to cthers without seniority list forth with.

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under iectron 151 CPC praying that in the ci -:umr;tances stated

in the affidavit filed r support of the petition, the High Courl rray be pleased to

direct the Official Re ;pondents to allot the houses, ldentit,, (lards as well as

house Patta Certific tes to the Petitioners situated at Rir reshwarambanda,

Ameenpur Mandal A ea Sangareddi District and not ro allc tt{)d the houses to

others with out senior ty list forth with pending disposal of the atrovr: WP.

Counsel for the Petit rners: SRl. VEERAMREDDIGARI PRAE ll AK,AR REDDY

Counsel for the ResS cndent No.1: GP FOR GENERAL ADMltr l.STttATlON

Counsel for the Res; cndents No 2, 3, 5 and 9 to 11 : GP FOF REVENUE

The Court made the rllowing: ORDER

HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

WRTT PETITION NO.l169T OF 2022

ORAL ORDER:

permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition, with a

liberry to file fresh writ petition. He has also addressed a letter dated

26.10.2022 to the Registrar (Judic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top