SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
Vanthala Malleswari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 2379/2022



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2379 OF 2022

Between:

1. Vanthala Malleswari, W/o. Laliban, Aged 29 years, Occ. Labour, Fl/o.

Pedalabudu Village, Araku Valley Mandal Visakhapatnam District, Andhra

Pradesh.

2. Vanthala Suhasini, W/o. Ravi, Aged 26 years, Occ. Labour, R/o. Vasantha

Village, Gantiyada [Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh.

3. Setti Radhamani, Wo. Laxman Rao, Aged 32 years, Occ. Labour, Fl/o.

Pedalabudu Village, Araku Valley lVandal, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra

Pradesh.

4. Setti Padma, W/o. Kondal Rao, Aged 50 years, Occ. Labour, R/o. Pedalabudu

Village, Araku Valley Mandl, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh.

5. Vanthala Kumari, Wo. Saibabu, Aged 31 years, Occ. Labour, Rl/o.

Pedalabudu Village, Araku Valley Mandal Visakhapatnam District, Andhra

Pradesh.

6. Pujari Ganga, W/o. V Dasu, Aged 20 years, Occ. Labour, R/o. Pedalabudu

Village, Araku Valley Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED -A8-A1 3

AND

The State of Telan

Telangana Hydera

Hyderabad.

s

b

ana, Rep. By its Publlc Prosecutor, High Court of

ad, Through Station House Officer, RailwayPolice Station,

...RESPONDENT

Petition under Section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C praying that in the

circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the

High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on Regular Bail to the

petitioners/ accused A-8 to A-13 in FIR No.138 of 2021 on the file of Railway

Police Station, Hyderabad, dated 0811212021 .

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of

Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Robba Nani

Babu, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of

the Sole Respondent.

The Courl made the following: ORDER

\

\

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

CRIMINAL PETITIO N No.2379 of 2022

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition, under Section 439 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C), is filed by the petitioners/A.B

to A. 13, for grant of bail in Crime No.13B of 2O2L of Railway

Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offence under

Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act, 1985.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners/A.B to A.13,

learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the

respondent/State and perused the record.

3,

Learned counsel for the petitioners/A.B to A. 13 would

contend that the petitioners/A.B to A. 13 are innocent and they

were falsely implicated in the subject crime. The petitioners/A.B

to A. 13 are in judicial custody since 08.12.2021 and ultimately

prayed to allow the Criminal Petition as prayed for.

4.

On the other hand, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor

opposed the grant of bail to the petitioners/A.B to A.13.

I

I

\

2

\

5. It is evident from the record that on 08.12'2021 at about

14.10 hours, while the police were conducting checking in Train

No.18519 LTT Express, the petitioners/A'B to A'13 and other

accused, were found travelling in Coach Nos.Bl, 82 83 with 24

bags under suspicious circumstances. Upon checking those bags,

the police found ganja in those bags and seized the same under

cover of panchanama. Altogether 308 kgs of ganja alleged to

have been seized from the possession of petitioners/A'B to A'13

and other accused, which is commercial quantity. Investigation

in the subject crime is in progress. This Court while granting ball

under Sectio n 439 Cr'P.C. has to see whether the twin

requirements under Section 37 of the NDPS Act i.e., i) there are

reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of

such offence; and (ii) he is not likely to commit any offence while

on bail, are satisfied 'or not. In the instant case, since huge

quantity of ganja alleged to have been seized from the

possession of the petitioners/A'B to A'13 and other accused,

unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top