COMMON ORDER:

The self-same 5 petitioners in each of the three revisions are the defendants in O.S.No.194 of 2006 filed by sole plaintiff on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa preferred these revisions impugning the dismissal order dated 02.11.2015 in I.A.No.1906 of 2015 (C.R.P.No.5297 of 2015), I.A.No.1904 of 2015 (C.R.P.No.5303 of 2015) and I.A.No.1905 of 2015(C.R.P.No.5308 of 2015) in the above suit filed to reopening the matter.

2. The petitioners in all the revisions hereinafter are referred to as defendants for sake of convenience.

3. The I.A.No.1906 of 2015 is filed by the defendants U/O.VIII rule 1(3) of C.P.C. seeking to receive the documents viz; registration copy of the assignment deeds 5 in number Doc.Nos.8620 of 1981 dt.04.11.1981, Doc.No.5335 of 1982 dated 05.08.1982, Doc.No.5336 of 1982 dated 05.08.1982,Doc.No.5340 of 1982,dated 05.08.1982 and Doc.No.5951 of 1982 dated 07.09.1982 by granting leave to prove their case. On hearing both sides, the trial Court held that the specific case of the respondent/plaintiff is that the D.1(died by D.3 to D.5) and his father had created Ex.B.2 sale deed, dated 17.06.1985 by forging her signature as if she executed and