SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NEELA LAXMANNA & 4 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF A.P., REP. BY P.P., H.C., HYD – Respondent


ORDER:

At tho hcuring, thc learnerl Public Prosecutor (T.S,), on instnrctions, has subnritted that rpart fi'onr the fict th:lt thc applic:rnts' cirscs rlo not lull $itltin thc erceptions in Batchu R:rnga Rao (supra) fur rejection of l)ail, their cond uct/bch aviou r is satisfactory.

-2 In thc light of the nforementioncd fircts, the :rpplicants :rrc rcleascd orr bail in tcrms of orrler, rllted 02.11.2016, in lliltchu llangn Ilao (supt'a) nntl sul)ject to thc lbllo* ing conditions:

3. The applicants must be present bclbrc the Court xt tllc tinrc ol he:rring ol the criminul appeal.

It is filltllcr'(lircctcd that ortlcr, (l:rtcd 02.[ 1.2016, in l]ltchLr llang:r Rro (suprx)

shall lbrnr pxl't ol this ordcr rrnd thc llcgistrt shall cnclosc tr copY thcrcol to this order.

'fhis applicatiort is. irccorclinglr. allorr crl."

Sd/. T. RANGA BABU ASSISTANT REqISTRAR //TRUE ('()I'Y// ,1(

'-'

FoT ASSISTANT ITEGISTRAR To I The lll Atlditional District and Sessitrns Judge, (FTC), Cirdrvirl, IVlahabuhna.qrr District.

2 The Judicial lVlagistrate ol First Class, Cadrral, \,[ahabubnagar'

3 The Station House olllcer, Maldakal Policc Stltion, l\4 ahaboolrrlrqar'

4 The Sullerintcn(lent. Cherlaltally Central Plison, RII

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top