SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
Smt.B.Nirmala – Appellant
Versus
D.Vasantha – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal by the unsuccessful respondents 2 to

4 under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is directed against the orders dated 15.02.2012 of the learned District Judge, Chittoor passed in S.O.P.No.271 of 2005.

2. I have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellants/respondents 2 to 4 and the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3/the petitioners. The 4th respondent herein is the 4th petitioner. The 5th respondent is impleaded being the legal representative of the deceased 1st respondent-D.B.Rajendran. I have perused the material record.

3. For convenience and clarity, the parties in this appeal shall hereinafter be referred to as ‘the petitioners’ and ‘the respondents’ as arrayed in the succession original petition before the Court below.

4. The facts leading to filing of the present appeal may be stated, in brief, as follows:

The petitioners had filed the Succession Original Petition under Section

372 of the Indian Succession Act against the respondents 1 to 4 for issuance of a succession certificate in respect of the petition schedule property, inter alia claiming that the 1st petitioner is the wife of the deceased D.V.Ba

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top