SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J
Shri Bhanudas Baban Pawar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.G.Deshmukh
For the Respondents: Mrs.Veera Shinde, APP

ORDER

1. The applicant/accused was convicted for the offence punishable under section 408 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to suffer R.I. for three months and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- in each case, in default to suffer R.I. for six months. These orders were passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pune on 12th March, 1997 in C.C. Nos. 80 of 1990 and 81 of 1990, which were confirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pune by the judgments and orders dated 11th January, 2002 by dismissing Criminal Appeal Nos. 49 and 50 of 1997 respectively.

2. In the year 1985-86, the applicant/accused was working as a Secretary in Vadgaon Nimbalkar Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Society Limited, Vadgaon Nimbalkar and he was in charge of all account books record. He was also looked after the audit of the society. During the audit of the accounts for the period from 1st July, 1984 to 30th June, 1985, misappropriation of Rs. 81592.43 was found. Hence, Mr. M.S.Kshirsagar, Auditor of Co-operative Societies, Baramati lodged a complaint against the applicant/accused and the offence was registered against him on 7th February, 1987.

3. As per the case of the prosecution, there was misap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top