SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
SANJAY NARAYAN KUDALKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['RACHEETA DHURU', '', 'SMT SHEETAL D MISHRA', 'V R BHOSALE', 'APP']

Dixit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.8 OF 2008

Sanjay Narayan Kudalkar

]

Aged about 34 years,

]

R/o. Satkarya Chawl, Room No.233,

]

Near Holi Maidan, Dharavi, Mumbai.

]

[At present lodged in Nasik Jail]

] …. Appellant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra,

Thru' Dharavi Police Station, Mumbai.

] …. Respondent

Mr. S.V. Kotwal with Mrs. Racheeta Dhuru

for the Appellant.

Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal, A.P.P., for the Respondent-State.

CORAM : P.V.HARDAS &

DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J.

DATE : 7 TH JANUARY, 2015.

ORAL JUDGMENT [Per Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J.] :

1.

By this Appeal, the Appellant challenges the correctness of the

Judgment of conviction and sentence recorded against him by the Court

of Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai in Sessions Case No.599

of 2003. The Appellant, by the said Judgment, is acquitted for the offence

punishable under Section 498-A of the I.P.C., however, convicted for the

offence punishable under Section 302 of the I.P.C. and sentenced to

suffer R.I. for life and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- with a default stipulation to

undergo S.I. for two months.

1/17

2.

Facts, which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top