SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
SHUKLESHWAR SARJERAO DEHSMUKH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHRI S G SURANA', '', 'SHRI SHAILESH KANTHARIA', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 117 OF 1992

Date of Decision : 23rd January, 2008.

For Approval and Signature :

The Honourable Mr. Justice R.M.S.Khandeparkar , J:

The Honourable Mr.Justice. A.A.Sayed, J :

1.

Whether Reporters of Local Papers

may be allowed to see the Judgment?

2.

Tobe referred to the Reporters or

not?

3.

Whether Their Lordships wish to see

the fair copy of the Judgment?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial

question of law as to the interpretation

of the Constitution of India, 1950, or any

Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be circulated to the

Civil Judges?

6.

Whether the case involves an important

questions of law and whether a copy of the

Judgment should be sent to Nagpur, Goa and

Aurangabad Office ?

***

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

2

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 117 OF 1992

Sukhlesahwar Sarjerao Deshmukh

Residing at Dholewadi (Haveli),

Taluka Junnar, District Pune.

… Appellant

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra

… Respondent

CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR AND

A.A. SAYED, JJ.

DATE: 23RD JANURARY 2008.

JUDGMENT (PER A.A. SAYED J.):

1. The above appeal is preferr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top