SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHRI RAMCHANDRA AKKOBA HANCHANALE AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
SHRI DATTATRAYA VITHAL PANDIT – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHRI M R KATIKAR', '', 'FOR PET NOS &', 'W P STAND DISMISSED AS', 'AGAINST PET NO VIDE', COURT'S ORDER DT, 'SEEMA SARNAIK']

:1:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO. 2109 OF 1985

WRIT PETITION NO. 2109 OF 1985

WRIT PETITION NO. 2109 OF 1985

1. Ramchandra Akkoba Hanchanale;

1. Ramchandra Akkoba Hanchanale;

1. Ramchandra Akkoba Hanchanale;

2. Bandu Akkoba Hanchanale;

2. Bandu Akkoba Hanchanale;

2. Bandu Akkoba Hanchanale;

3. Pandurang Akkoba Hanchanale. ... Petitioners

3. Pandurang Akkoba Hanchanale. ... Petitioners

3. Pandurang Akkoba Hanchanale. ... Petitioners

versus

versus

versus

Dattatraya Vithal Pandit, since

Dattat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top