SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
MANGESH NANDA KHEDEKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASTHRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['S/SHRI PRADEEP M PATIL and', '', 'L M ACHARYA', 'Adv Swaraj S Jadhav', 'appointed from Legal Aid Commiittee vide cts order dt', 'P P']

1/14 APEAL 561-98.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 561 of 1998

Mangesh Nanda Khedekar

.. Appellant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

.. Respondents

Mr.Swaraj S. Jadhav for the appellant.

Mr.Y.Y. Dabake, APP for the State.

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

RESERVED ON : 6th APRIL 2021

PRONOUNCED : 28th APRIL 2021

JUDGMENT:-

1

By the present Appeal, the appellant has questioned

the judgment and order dated 20th May 1998 passed by the Addl.

Sessions Judge, Raigad, Alibag in Sessions Case No.62 of 1997.

The Appeal is admitted on 29th June 1998 and the appellant was

released on bail.

2

Advocate Shri Swaraj Jadhav was appointed by the

High Court Legal Aid Services Committee since the appellant

remained unrepresented.

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and

Mr.Y.Y. Dabake, learned APP for the State.

Tilak

2/14 APEAL 561-98.doc

3

One Ramchandra Rama Mahadik working as

watchman in the Wild Life Sanctuary on daily wages reported of

an inc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top