SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
GAJANAN DATTATRAYA PORE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['R S KATE AND N D SHIVARKAR ADV FOR', '', 'APPELLANT', 'P P']

1

IN

THE

HIGH

COURT

OF

JUDICATURE

AT

BOMBAY

APPELLATE

SIDE

JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL

APPEAL

NO.579

OF

1997

Gajanan Dattatraya Pore,

)

Age Adult, Occupation - R/o.

)

Shivari, Tal.Purandhar,

)

District - Pune.

)..

Appellant

(

Org.Accused

)

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra.

)..

Respondent

--

S/Shri

R.S.Kate

and

N.B.Shivarkar

for

the

appellant.

Ms

P.H.Kantharia,

APP

for

State.

--

CORAM

:

V.G.PALSHIKAR

&

R.C.CHAVAN,

JJ

DATED

:

11TH

JULY,

2005

ORAL

ORAL

ORAL

JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT

:

(

Per

R.C.Chavan,

J

)

:

(

Per

R.C.Chavan,

J

)

:

(

Per

R.C.Chavan,

J

)

1.

Being aggrieved by his conviction for offence

punishable

under

Section

302

of

Indian

Penal

Code

and

resultant

sentence

of

imprisonment

for

life

and

fine

of

Rs.2,000/-

imposed

upon

him,

the

accused

Gajanan

in

Sessions

Case

No.166

of

1997

before

the

learned

Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, has preferred this

appeal.

2.

Facts which led to the prosecution are as

2

under:-

.

Deceased Rajendra used to tease wife of

accused

Gajanan.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top