HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
GANPATI RAJARAM SHINDE @ GANAPTI RAJARAM CHOUGULE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS – Respondent
WP 6476/2022
16.5598.22-wp+.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5598 OF 2022
Uttam Ramchandra Chougule
….. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.6476 OF 2022
Ganpati Rajaram Shinde @ Ganpati
Rajaram Chougule
….. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.1762 OF 2022
Mrs.Sunita Anilkumar Shinde
….. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.5600 OF 2022
Shri Uttam Nana Kamble
….. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….. Respondents
Mohite
1/4
TRUSHA
TUSHAR
MOHITE
Digitally
signed by
TRUSHA
TUSHAR
MOHITE
Date:
2022.07.19
18:36:00
+0530
16.5598.22-wp+.docx
WITH
WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.725 OF 2022
Shri Ajitkumar Baburao Patil
….. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.722 OF 2022
Shri Kisan Lahu Gavali
….. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.724 OF 2022
Shri Sunil Vasant Chavan
….. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.5603 OF 2022
Shri Sandip Balkrishna Mohire
….. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….. Respondents
Mohite
2/4
16.5598.22-wp+.docx
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.6478 OF 2022
Shri Rajkumar Mahadeo Kamble
….. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.6479 OF 2022
Smt.Asha Ramchandra Bhandwalkar
….. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….. Respondents
Mr. Mandar Bagkar i/b Mr.Vinayak Kumbhar for the Petitioner
Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar i/b Ms.Ashwini Bandiwadekar for Respondent
nos.6 and 7
Mr.S.B.Kalel, A.G.P. for the Respondent nos.1 to 5
CORAM:
S.V. GANGAPURWALA &
S. M. MODAK, JJ.
DATED :
JULY 18, 2022
P.C.
1
The learned counsel submits that the petitioners are working
as teaching and non-teaching employees with Respondent no.7 Night
School. They have necessary workload. As such, are required to be
Mohite
3/4
16.5598.22-wp+.docx
treated as full time employee in view of G.R.dated 17.05.2017.
2
The learned counsel appears for Respondent nos.6 and 7 and
submits that the management would submit the proposal to the
Education of昀椀cer in that regard within six weeks from today.
Statement is accepted.
3
After the proposal is received by Respondent no.5, Respondent
no.5 shall process the said proposals received from Respondent no.7
seeking bene昀椀t of G.R. dated 17.05.2017 and if he is competent, shall
take decision upon it within 3 months from the date of receiving the
proposal and if he is required to forward the proposal to the higher
authorities, then shall forward the same within 3 months. The
Higher Authorities shall complete the process expeditiously.
4
Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.
(S. M. MODAK,J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
Mohite
4/4