SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHASHIKANT NAMDEO BARATHE – Appellant
Versus
INDRAJIT BANSARIDAS AGARWAL – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHRI ABHIJIT P KULKARNI', 'SHRI V G PESHAVE', 'FOR', '', 'R NO', 'P P']

OSK 217-APEAL-715-1998.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 715 OF 1998

Shri Shashikant Namdeo Barathe

Appellant.

Versus

Shri Indrajit Bansaridas Agarwal & Anr.

... Respondents.

Mr.Manoj Badgujal h/f. Mr.Abhijeet P. Kulkarni for the Appellant.

None for Respondent No.1.

Mrs.G.P.Mulekar, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State.

CORAM

:

S.B. SHUKRE, J.

DATED

:

17TH JUNE, 2016.

P.C. :

1]

This is an appeal preferred against the judgment and

order dated 11th February, 1994 delivered in Summary Criminal Case

No.116 of 1991 by Judicial Magistrate First Class (P.M.C.), Pune,

thereby acquitting the respondent No.1 of the offence punishable

under Section 398 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation

Act, 1949.

2]

The respondent No.1 was prosecuted on the basis of the

complaint lodged by the appellant that on 8th March, 1991, the

1/4

OSK 217-APEAL-715-1998.odt

respondent No.1 by transporting the goods by vehicle i.e. One Tempo

within the city limits of Pune corporation without paying the Octroi

committed an offence punishable under Section 398 of the Bombay

Provincial Muni

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top