SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SWATI SUNIL UMRANI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
ABA 74/2021



1 / 4 30 ABA 169-2021 aw others.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 169 OF 2021

Pandurang Ramrao Randive

.... Applicant

versus

The State of Maharashtra

.... Respondent

WITH

CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 29 OF 2021

Krushnarao Khandoji Bandal

.... Applicant

versus

The State of Maharashtra

.... Respondent

WITH

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 58 OF 2021

Sou. Kusum Chandrakant Deshmukh

.... Applicant

versus

The State of Maharashtra

.... Respondent

WITH

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 74 OF 2021

Swati Sunil Umrani

.... Applicant

versus

The State of Maharashtra

.... Respondent

WITH

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 67 OF 2021

Madhukar Dnyanoba Bandal

.... Applicant

versus

The State of Maharashtra

.... Respondent

Manjusha

2 / 4 30 ABA 169-2021 aw others.odt

WITH

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 93 OF 2021

Dadabhau Niloba Kale

.... Applicant

versus

The State of Maharashtra

.... Respondent

WITH

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 172 OF 2021

Ajay Pannalal Rander

.... Applicant

versus

The State of Maharashtra

.... Respondent

WITH

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 195 OF 2021

Ramesh Shankar Wani

.... Applicant

versus

The State of Maharashtra

.... Respondent

WITH

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 205 OF 2021

Sou. Ashwini Rajendra Thorave & Ors.

.... Applicants

versus

The State of Maharashtra

.... Respondent

WITH

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 344 OF 2021

Pradip Balkrishna Kulkarni

.... Applicant

versus

The State of Maharashtra

.... Respondent

…....

Mr. Siddharth S. Chapalgaonkar i/b. Mr. Nitin P. Deshpande, for

Applicants in ABA/169/20021 and ABA/172/2021.

Mr. Rajiv Patil, Sr. Adv. i/b. Mr. Prashant M. Patil, for Applicant in

3 / 4 30 ABA 169-2021 aw others.odt

ABA/29/2021.

Mr. Avinash B. Avhad, for Applicant in ABA/58/2021.

Mr. Pawan Mali, for Applicant in ABA/74/2021.

Mr. S. R. Chopade a/w Mr. Ankit Dhindale i/b. Radhika S.

Panchpor, for Applicant in ABA/67/2021.

Mr. Ravindra K. Adsure a/w. Mr. Sidheshwar Biradar a/w. Mr. Yash

Sonavane, for Applicant in ABA/93/2021.

Mr. S. B. Gaikwad, for Applicant in ABA/195/2021.

Mr. Abhaykumar Apte, for Applicant in ABA/205/2021.

Mr. Milind D. Pawar, for Applicant in ABA/344/2021.

Mr. Ajay Patil and Mr. S. H. Yadav, APPs for the State/Respondent.

Ms. Hetvi Nishar i/b. Ms. Sapna Krishnappa, for Intervener.

…....

CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE

: 16th FEBRUARY, 2021

P.C. :

.

On the last occasion in these matters, learned APP was

directed to file Affidavit of Investigating Officer pointing out the

role of each of the applicants. Today, the learned APP states that he

is in the process of filing of that Affidavit. However, he also

submits that in some cases, the Investigating Agency may not

require custodial interrogation of some of the applicants. All those

facts will have to be put on Affidavit. Therefore, today, I am

adjourning the matters with continuation of interim relief to

4 / 4 30 ABA 169-2021 aw others.odt

enable learned APP to file his Affidavit.

2.

Stand over to 2nd March 2021.

3.

Interim orders granted earlier to continue till then.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top