SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
ANWAR SALIM SAYYAD AND ORS. (DISMISSED AS PER CTS. ORDER DT – Respondent


Advocates:
['PUBLIC PROSECUTOR', 'SHRI ROHAN NAHAR R NO', 'TO', '', 'U B NIGHOT']

1/11

1.a35.06.doc

Shiv

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.35 OF 2006

The State of Maharashtra

… Appellant

Vs.

Anwar Salim Sayyad & Ors.

… Respondents

Ms. S. S. Kaushik APP for the Appellant-State.

Mr. Lokesh Zade i/b Rohan Nahar for Respondent Nos.2, 4 to 7.

Mr. U. B. Nighot for Respondent No.3.

CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.

DATED : 29TH NOVEMBER 2022.

P.C:-

1.

Heard Ms. S.S. Kaushik learned APP for the Appellant-State and

learned counsel Mr. Lokesh Zade for Respondent Nos.2, 4 to 7 and

learned Advocate Mr. U. B. Nighot for Respondent No.3.

2.

The Appeal was admitted on 15th December 2005, against

eight accused/Respondent Nos.1 to 8. However, on 15th June 2022,

this Court directed the Appellant to take necessary steps to serve

Respondents-accused Nos.1 and 8 within a period of four weeks,

failing which, it is observed that the Appeal will stand dismissed.

Unfortunately, no steps were taken and that’s how the Appeal stood

dismissed against Respondent No.1 and 8.

3.

The Special Judge under the Maharashtra Control of Organized

Crime Act, 1999 (hereinafter referre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top